Univariate data plausibility checks in water management
The workflows of the hetida platform enable univariate data plausibility checks to quickly identify incorrect measured values. In this article, we describe how to proceed in such a case from the water industry.In this article, we describe how to proceed in such a case from the water industry.
Purpose of the plausibility check
On 24.11.2024, some values are initially missing, then the water level is suddenly three meters higher than before and thus even above the maximum level of 600 cm. During her investigations, the employee finds out that the sensor was reconfigured during the period of missing data – it is a distance-measuring water level sensor and the suspension height must have been set incorrectly. This is easy to fix. The only annoying thing is that the error only becomes apparent after two days of incorrect measurements.
To avoid implausible measurement data, the causes of errors must be identified and rectified as quickly as possible. To do this, we need an automatic measurement data plausibility check that provides an overview of all incorrectly measuring sensors at a glance. We implement this requirement below in the IoT and analytics solution hetida platform.
We proceed as follows:
- First, we visualize typical implausible data for each sensor type used by the urban drainage system.
- On this basis, we introduce univariate rules for the automatic detection of such implausibilities.
- We then use these rules to check the plausibility of measurement data by creating a hierarchy of all urban drainage sensors in the hetida platform and implementing workflows in hetida designer that execute the rules.
- Finally, we create a user-friendly dashboard in the hetida platform that shows all implausibilities in the data at a glance.
Examples of implausible data
Univariate rules to detect implausible data
Rule for detecting outliers: All measured values that deviate unusually strongly from the previous measured values are implausible. This rule applies to water level and temperature sensors.
Hierarchical organization of sensors in the hetida platform
Implementation of the rules in hetida designer
For each of the rules defined above for checking the plausibility of measurement data, we create a workflow in hetida designer that receives the time series of values measured by the sensor as input. All implausible data is identified using the rules that match the sensor type. The output is a plot of the time series in which all incorrect values are marked as such. Here is the workflow for a water level sensor, which contains the rules for the valid value range and missing data:
The workflow tool hetida designer recognizes the missing data and values above the permitted maximum and marks them with an orange background.
Presentation of the results in the hetida platform
The urban drainage employee now creates a dashboard in the hetida platform in which she brings together all the installed sensors. For each sensor, the measured time series is sent through the hetida designer workflow that matches the sensor type and any implausibilities detected are plotted together with the time series. At the time selected here, there were three periods of implausible data in the last 24 hours and one of the sensors is still affected:
Experience the IoT and analytics platform live and make an appointment.
Our experts will get in touch with you shortly.
We look forward to hearing from you.